Model comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.0 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.0

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.8 Max scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.1 to 34.9.
  • Both cost about the same: $2 input and $6 output per million tokens.
  • Qwen3.8 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Qwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index56.037.7
Released2026-08-022025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$6$7.50
Results tracked3825

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Qwen3.8 Max: 52.3 (#30), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev16711275
LMArena Coding14991413
DeepSWE57.5%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
FrontierSWE15.8%—
SciCode52.9%—
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3.8 Max leads

Qwen3.8 Max: 42.6 (#17), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
τ²-bench Banking55.1%—
GDP.pdf23.2%—

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Qwen3.8 Max: 53.4 (#26), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14931372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
NYT Connections (extended)88.3%—
CritPt20%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
Mystery Game Puzzles38%—
DTBench92%—
LMCA46.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.69—

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Qwen3.8 Max: 73.1 (#15), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math14981364
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#25), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert15041337
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified47.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.8 Max: 36.9 (#70), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly20%—

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Qwen3.8 Max: 56.6 (#18), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14681345
LMArena Chinese15371356
LMArena French15021394
LMArena German14891324
LMArena Japanese14661309
LMArena Korean14671307
LMArena Russian14781367
LMArena Spanish14951360

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Qwen3.8 Max: 77.7 (#19), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14781356

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Qwen3.8 Max: 45.5 (#30), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14861379

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Qwen3.8 Max: 67.0 (#31), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.8 MaxQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text14801356
LMArena Creative Writing14781333
LMArena Multi-Turn14871365

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8 Max better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.0 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max lists at $2 and $6.

Is Qwen3.8 Max or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.3 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Max does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.8 Max has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper