Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Plus vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

32.6

Rank #242 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 49.3 to 13.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus and 4.4% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
  • Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index45.032.6
Released2026-06-022024-11-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$1.60—
Results tracked3214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding14731236
FrontierCode10.2%—
SciCode45.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OSWorld 2.02.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14601220
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
CritPt9.1%—
Chess Puzzles24%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench84%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index147.39—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%4.4%
LMArena Math14671242
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)34.4%—
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond87.9%46.3%
LMArena Expert1467—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Vision1281—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English14451236
LMArena Chinese15101249
LMArena Russian14571246
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1471—
LMArena Japanese1411—
LMArena Korean1416—
LMArena Spanish1453—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following14391233

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query14541224

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 PlusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text14541256
LMArena Creative Writing14391231
LMArena Multi-Turn14591252

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.1 vs 35.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Plus and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Plus has 32 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper