Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs Yi-34B

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 90.9% for Qwen3.7 Max and 14.7% for Yi-34B.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 MaxYi-34B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)01.AI
Noometry Index51.527.8
Released2026-05-192023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked3323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-34B
LMArena Coding14981112
SWE-bench Verified77.3%—
LMArena WebDev1515—
SciCode48.8%—
ALE-Bench1,189—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135), Yi-34B: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-34B
GBAEval0.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14831104
Epoch Capabilities Index153.68117.39
SimpleBench70.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt13.4%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
EBR-Bench9.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench92.3%—
LMCA44%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-34B
LMArena Math14901114
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 434.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench26%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-34B
GPQA Diamond90.9%14.7%
LMArena Expert14881061
SimpleQA Verified55.8%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-34B
LMArena Non-English14741079
LMArena Chinese15301176
LMArena Russian14841050
LMArena French—1081
LMArena German—1042
LMArena Japanese—993
LMArena Korean—959
LMArena Spanish—1070

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14601091

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14821094

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-34B
LMArena Text14761129
LMArena Creative Writing14491108
LMArena Multi-Turn14811113
EQ-Bench 41110—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Max better than Yi-34B?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.7 Max or Yi-34B better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and Yi-34B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper