Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs Yi-1.5-34B

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 90.9% for Qwen3.7 Max and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 MaxYi-1.5-34B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)01.AI
Noometry Index51.530.6
Released2026-05-192024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked3321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding14981169
SWE-bench Verified77.3%—
LMArena WebDev1515—
SciCode48.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%
ALE-Bench1,189—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135), Yi-1.5-34B: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-1.5-34B
GBAEval0.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14831160
SimpleBench70.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt13.4%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
EBR-Bench9.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench92.3%—
LMCA44%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.68—

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math14901182
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 434.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench26%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond90.9%32%
LMArena Expert14881144
SimpleQA Verified55.8%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English14741121
LMArena Chinese15301213
LMArena Russian14841091
LMArena French—1156
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021
LMArena Korean—1005
LMArena Spanish—1121

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14601139

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query14821143

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text14761173
LMArena Creative Writing14491135
LMArena Multi-Turn14811153
EQ-Bench 41110—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Max better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.7 Max or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and Yi-1.5-34B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper