Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs Solar Pro 3

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Solar Pro 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Solar Pro 3 Upstage

33.3

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher in 2 categories and Solar Pro 3 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 48.4 to 21.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 48.8% for Qwen3.7 Max and 24.7% for Solar Pro 3.
  • Solar Pro 3 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Qwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Upstage
Noometry Index51.433.3
Released2026-05-192026-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M131K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$7.50$0.25
Results tracked332

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43), Solar Pro 3: 34.2

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3
SciCode48.8%24.7%
SWE-bench Verified77.3%—
LMArena WebDev1515—
LMArena Coding1498—
ALE-Bench1,189—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129), Solar Pro 3: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3
GBAEval0.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36), Solar Pro 3: 21.7

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3
CritPt13.4%0%
SimpleBench70.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
EBR-Bench9.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1483—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench92.3%—
LMCA44%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.74—

Math Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26), Solar Pro 3: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 434.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench26%—
LMArena Math1488—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24), Solar Pro 3: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
SimpleQA Verified55.8%—
LMArena Expert1488—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13), Solar Pro 3: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3
LMArena Non-English1475—
LMArena Chinese1533—
LMArena Russian1482—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34), Solar Pro 3: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3
LMArena Instruction Following1460—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34), Solar Pro 3: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3
LMArena Longer Query1484—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52), Solar Pro 3: —

BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3
LMArena Text1476—
LMArena Creative Writing1450—
EQ-Bench 41110—
LMArena Multi-Turn1482—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.7 Max better than Solar Pro 3?

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Solar Pro 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Solar Pro 3?

Solar Pro 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Is Qwen3.7 Max or Solar Pro 3 better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and Solar Pro 3 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro 3 has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper