Model comparison
Qwen3.7 Max vs QwQ Plus
Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#42); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher in 1 category and QwQ Plus in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 36.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 90.9% for Qwen3.7 Max and 65.4% for QwQ Plus.
- QwQ Plus is cheaper at $0.80 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Qwen3.7 Max | QwQ Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 51.5 | 38.0 |
| Released | 2026-05-19 | 2025-03-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.50 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 1 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1515 | — |
| SciCode | 48.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 0.4% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 70.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.1% | — |
| CritPt | 13.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 19% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 92.3% | — |
| LMCA | 44% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.68 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 34.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1490 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads
Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28), QwQ Plus: 36.4
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | 65.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 55.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1488 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1484 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54), QwQ Plus: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | QwQ Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.7 Max better than QwQ Plus?
Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#42); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or QwQ Plus?
QwQ Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and QwQ Plus share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and QwQ Plus has 1.