Model comparison
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 38.3 to 14.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash and 4.4% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.7 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.03 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.13 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1235 |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 43.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 23% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1220 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 15% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.64 | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | 4.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 19.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1242 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | 46.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1246 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1233 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.