Model comparison
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Step 3
Qwen3.7 Flash and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 36.2.
- Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.7 Flash | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.03 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.13 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Step 3: 39.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 43.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 23% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1355 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 15% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.62 | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 19.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69), Step 3: 36.2 (#161)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1176 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Step 3: 46.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Step 3: 70.6 (#159)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Step 3: 40.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Step 3: 54.5 (#146)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Step 3?
Qwen3.7 Flash and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Step 3 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.