Model comparison
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Ring-2.6-1T
Qwen3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#152); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.7 Flash | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.03 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.13 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: —, Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108), Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 43.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 23% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 15% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.62 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 19.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Qwen3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#152); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.