Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Plus vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher in 8 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 35.2.

Side by side

Qwen3.6 Plus and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Qwen3.6 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index47.539.2
Released2026-03-31—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$3—
Results tracked3712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding14671316
SWE-bench Verified57.9%—
LMArena WebDev1461—
SciCode40.7%—
ALE-Bench670.15—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Plus: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
Vending-Bench 25,115—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts14491299
NYT Connections (extended)60.3%—
CritPt2.9%—
Chess Puzzles17%—
Thematic Generalization59.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench81.9%—
LMCA33.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index147.65—

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math14501304
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)38.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)26.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)8.3%—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert14541279
GPQA Diamond88.4%—
SimpleQA Verified44.1%—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English14241290
LMArena Chinese14771331
LMArena Russian14341324
LMArena French1455—
LMArena German1452—
LMArena Japanese1389—
LMArena Korean1379—
LMArena Spanish1432—

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following14251287

Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query14391307
CL-bench20.3%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text14371321
LMArena Creative Writing14041328
LMArena Multi-Turn14381292

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.6 Plus or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Plus and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Plus has 37 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper