Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Wizardlm 13b

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 63.8 to 30.5.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.6 Max Preview and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Qwen3.6 Max PreviewWizardlm 13b
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Microsoft
Noometry Index51.531.4
Released2026-04-20—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.30—
Output $ / M tokens$7.80—
Results tracked2910

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14711035
SWE-bench Verified76.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —, Wizardlm 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewWizardlm 13b
Vending-Bench 24,254—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14571018
SimpleBench63%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.1%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench87.2%—
LMCA42.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.24—

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14651017
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)23.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond87.4%—
SimpleQA Verified52%—
LMArena Expert1478—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14371034
LMArena Chinese14871023
LMArena French1449—
LMArena Russian1445—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following14381048

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14571054

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14471077
LMArena Creative Writing14351091
LMArena Multi-Turn14561047

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Max Preview and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper