Model comparison
Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Qwen3 Max
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3 Max in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 40.8 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 74.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview and 30.1% for Qwen3 Max.
- Qwen3 Max is cheaper at $1.20 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $1.30 / $7.80 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
Side by side
| Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 51.1 | 43.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.30 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.80 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50), Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1456 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1482 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 4,254 | 71.56 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47), Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 74.1% | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1448 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | 5% |
| DTBench | 87.2% | 82.1% |
| LMCA | 42.5% | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.27 | 142.41 |
| SimpleBench | 63% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40), Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1465 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 23.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.4% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52% | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1476 | 1457 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46), Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1487 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1449 | 1450 |
| LMArena Russian | 1444 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1452 | 1463 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51), Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1420 |
Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1457 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58), Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1447 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1446 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview better than Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Max Preview or Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists at $1.30 and $7.80.
Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Max Preview and Qwen3 Max share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.