Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#36); Qwen3.8 Flash does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.1

Rank #36 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

35.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.47 per million input/output tokens, against $1.30 / $7.80 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
  • Qwen3.8 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Qwen3.6 Max Preview and Qwen3.8 Flash specifications
Qwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Flash
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index51.135.1
Released2026-04-202026-08-26
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.30$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$7.80$0.47
Results tracked291

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50), Qwen3.8 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Flash
SWE-bench Verified76.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—
LMArena Coding1472—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —, Qwen3.8 Flash: 31.2

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Flash
GDP.pdf—16.6%
Vending-Bench 24,254—

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47), Qwen3.8 Flash: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Flash
SimpleBench63%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.1%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1457—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench87.2%—
LMCA42.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.27—

Math Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40), Qwen3.8 Flash: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
LMArena Math1465—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)23.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35), Qwen3.8 Flash: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Flash
GPQA Diamond87.4%—
SimpleQA Verified52%—
LMArena Expert1476—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46), Qwen3.8 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Flash
LMArena Non-English1436—
LMArena Chinese1487—
LMArena French1449—
LMArena Russian1444—
LMArena Spanish1452—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51), Qwen3.8 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1437—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59), Qwen3.8 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1457—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58), Qwen3.8 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Flash
LMArena Text1447—
LMArena Creative Writing1435—
LMArena Multi-Turn1456—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview better than Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#36); Qwen3.8 Flash does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Max Preview or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.47 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists at $1.30 and $7.80.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Max Preview and Qwen3.8 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Flash has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper