Model comparison
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3 8B
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3 8B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 29.0 to 16.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash and 56.1% for Qwen3 8B.
- Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-27 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.19 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.13 | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | 5% |
| DTBench | 77.1% | 59.7% |
| LMCA | 31% | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.26 | 136.17 |
| SimpleBench | 35.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 18% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.4% | 56.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 22.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 10.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 56.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 15.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Flash | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.6 Flash better than Qwen3 8B?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Flash or Qwen3 8B?
Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Flash and Qwen3 8B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.