Model comparison
Qwen3.6 27B vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 47.5 to 27.8.
Side by side
| Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 27B leads
Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 37.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 27B leads
Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 78.1% | — |
| LMCA | 34.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.47 | — |
Math Qwen3.6 27B leads
Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 35.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.6 27B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.6 27B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1049 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.6 27B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 27B leads
Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1090 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1026 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.6 27B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen3.6 27B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 27B and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 27B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.