Model comparison
Qwen3.6 27B vs Ring-2.6-1T
Qwen3.6 27B has enough public results to be ranked (#112); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 2 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 37.3% for Qwen3.6 27B and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.
Side by side
| Qwen3.6 27B | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Ring-2.6-1T leads
Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148), Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.9% | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 78.1% | — |
| LMCA | 34.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.47 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 35.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1026 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.6 27B better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Qwen3.6 27B has enough public results to be ranked (#112); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Qwen3.6 27B or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 27B and Ring-2.6-1T share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 27B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.