Model comparison

Qwen3.5 Plus vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 Plus costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 40.0 to 32.8.
  • Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 Plus and Step 5 Preview specifications
Qwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index42.947.9
Released2026-02-162026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1.02M
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$1
Output $ / M tokens$2.40$2.70
Results tracked1518

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
LMArena Coding—1480
ALE-Bench621.92—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
Vending-Bench 20.54—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
CritPt—20.9%
Chess Puzzles22%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1465
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench80.5%—
LMCA36.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.78—

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%—
ProofBench—42%
LMArena Math—1470
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond84.8%—
SimpleQA Verified25.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.7%—
LMArena Expert—1470

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English—1432
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1439

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1444

Long Context Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
CL-bench19.8%—
CL-bench Life12.4%—
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text—1442
LMArena Creative Writing—1410
LMArena Multi-Turn—1447

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 Plus better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 Plus costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 Plus or Step 5 Preview?

Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Plus and Step 5 Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Plus has 15 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper