Model comparison
Qwen3.5 Plus vs Step 3
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 37.6.
- Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 40.5 |
| Released | 2026-02-16 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 3: 40.1 (#147)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
| ALE-Bench | 621.92 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 3: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 0.54 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1355 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | — |
| DTBench | 80.5% | — |
| LMCA | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.78 | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 25.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 3: 46.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 3: 70.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 19.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 12.4% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Step 3: 54.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.5 Plus better than Step 3?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Plus and Step 3 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Plus has 15 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.