Model comparison

Qwen3.5 Max Preview vs Step 3.5 Flash

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher in 7 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 30.8 to 22.2.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 Max Preview and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Qwen3.5 Max PreviewStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index45.342.3
Released—2026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding14871436

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14831411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math14741408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert14891421

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English14651385
LMArena Chinese15341447
LMArena French14841421
LMArena German14871405
LMArena Japanese14951354
LMArena Korean14381352
LMArena Russian14711385
LMArena Spanish14701419

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14671385

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query14761402

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text14701403
LMArena Creative Writing14641357
LMArena Multi-Turn14781405

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 Max Preview better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.5 Max Preview or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Max Preview and Step 3.5 Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper