Model comparison

Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.5

Rank #112 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 33.7 to 25.5.
  • Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Qwen3.5-Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Qwen3.5-FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.538.1
Released2026-02-232025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.40$7.50
Results tracked3225

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev12441275
LMArena Coding14121412
ALE-Bench221.8461.45
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.5-Flash: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Vending-Bench 2462.69—

Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14031372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles20%—
DTBench82.9%—
LMCA29.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index143.98—

Math Too close to call

Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math14071365
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)18.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)6.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14071338
GPQA Diamond82.3%—
SimpleQA Verified20.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.5%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English13851346
LMArena Chinese14461357
LMArena French14121398
LMArena German13901325
LMArena Japanese13681310
LMArena Korean13441305
LMArena Russian13791366
LMArena Spanish14001360

Instruction Following Too close to call

Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13741355

Long Context Too close to call

Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13921378

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text13971357
LMArena Creative Writing13431333
LMArena Multi-Turn13931365

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5-Flash better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-Flash or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Qwen3.5-Flash or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5-Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5-Flash has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper