Model comparison
Qwen3.5-9B vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 35.9 to 30.1.
Side by side
| Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-02-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5-9B leads
Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 9.2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5-9B leads
Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| DTBench | 71.2% | — |
| LMCA | 24.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.46 | — |
Math Qwen3.5-9B leads
Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 48.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 61.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.5-9B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.5-9B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen3.5-9B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen3.5-9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5-9B and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5-9B has 10 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.