Model comparison
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 58.1 to 30.7.
Side by side
| Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-02-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.5 (#244), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1410 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1254 | — |
| SciCode | 29.3% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 23.9 (#158), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1400 | 1018 |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 10% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.52 | — |
Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 38.4 (#86), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1017 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 56% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 70% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.7 (#73), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.2 (#122), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1379 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1458 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1412 | — |
| LMArena German | 1367 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1326 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 73.0 (#123), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1379 | 1049 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#122), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1390 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 58.1 (#118), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1395 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1391 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen3.5 35B-A3B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 35B-A3B and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.