Model comparison

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 35B-A3B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

41.7

Rank #118 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #229 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $2 for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Qwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.733.8
Released2026-02-012026-02-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$2$0.80
Results tracked283

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.5 (#244), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode29.3%32.3%
LMArena WebDev1254—
WeirdML—34.4%
LMArena Coding1410—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 23.9 (#158), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
CritPt0.6%0%
Chess Puzzles10%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1400—
DTBench80%—
LMCA29.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.52—

Math Not comparable

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 38.4 (#86), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions56%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202570%—
LMArena Math1404—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.7 (#73), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond83.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.5%—
LMArena Expert1408—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.2 (#122), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1379—
LMArena Chinese1458—
LMArena French1412—
LMArena German1367—
LMArena Japanese1326—
LMArena Korean1354—
LMArena Russian1377—
LMArena Spanish1390—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 73.0 (#123), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1379—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#122), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1390—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 58.1 (#118), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1395—
LMArena Creative Writing1347—
LMArena Multi-Turn1391—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 35B-A3B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 35B-A3B lists at $0.25 and $2.

Is Qwen3.5 35B-A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 35B-A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper