Model comparison

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Yi-34B

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.1

Rank #119 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 38.8 to 7.5.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Yi-34B specifications
Qwen3.5 122B-A10BYi-34B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)01.AI
Noometry Index42.127.8
Released2026-02-232023-11-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked2723

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BYi-34B
LMArena Coding14361112
LMArena WebDev1360—
SciCode35.6%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14211104
NYT Connections (extended)51.7%—
CritPt0.9%—
Thematic Generalization51.2%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench84.3%—
LMCA32.2%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—117.39

Math Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BYi-34B
LMArena Math14321114
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BYi-34B
LMArena Expert14321061
GPQA Diamond—14.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.2%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57), Yi-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BYi-34B
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BYi-34B
LMArena Non-English14001079
LMArena Chinese14621176
LMArena French14421081
LMArena German14261042
LMArena Japanese1367993
LMArena Korean1352959
LMArena Russian14001050
LMArena Spanish14241070

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following13991091

Long Context Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14101094

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BYi-34B
LMArena Text14171129
LMArena Creative Writing13681108
LMArena Multi-Turn14161113

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better than Yi-34B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Yi-34B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Yi-34B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper