Model comparison
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Step 3.7 Flash
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 122B-A10B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher in 1 category and Step 3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 27.2 to 21.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 51.7% for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and 39.7% for Step 3.7 Flash.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $3.20 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B.
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2026-02-23 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 256K |
| Max output | 66K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.6% | 40% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1436 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 51.7% | 39.7% |
| CritPt | 0.9% | 2.3% |
| Thematic Generalization | 51.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1421 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | — |
| DTBench | 84.3% | — |
| LMCA | 32.2% | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1432 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1442 | — |
| LMArena German | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1367 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1424 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1399 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1410 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1416 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 122B-A10B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B lists at $0.40 and $3.20.
Is Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (39.1 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Step 3.7 Flash share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.