Model comparison

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 60.0 to 55.3.
  • Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is cheaper at $0.40 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Qwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.138.1
Released2026-02-232025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$3.20$7.50
Results tracked2725

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev13601275
LMArena Coding14361412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
SciCode35.6%—
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14211372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
NYT Connections (extended)51.7%—
CritPt0.9%—
Thematic Generalization51.2%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench84.3%—
LMCA32.2%—

Math Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math14321365

Knowledge Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14321338
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14001346
LMArena Chinese14621357
LMArena French14421398
LMArena German14261325
LMArena Japanese13671310
LMArena Korean13521305
LMArena Russian14001366
LMArena Spanish14241360

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13991355

Long Context Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14101378

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text14171357
LMArena Creative Writing13681333
LMArena Multi-Turn14161365

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper