Model comparison
Qwen3-4B vs Yi-1.5-34B
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3-4B scores higher in 2 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 52.3% for Qwen3-4B and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.
Side by side
| Qwen3-4B | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2025-04-29 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3-4B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94), Yi-1.5-34B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 35.7% | — |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1160 |
Math Qwen3-4B leads
Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 38.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 52.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 52.3% | 32% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3-4B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena French | — | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1120 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3-4B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1139 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3-4B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1144 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3-4B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)
| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3-4B better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3-4B and Yi-1.5-34B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3-4B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.