Model comparison

Qwen3-4B vs Trinity Large Thinking

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-4B

Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3-4B scores higher in 1 category and Trinity Large Thinking in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in math, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 37.6 to 29.7.

Side by side

Qwen3-4B and Trinity Large Thinking specifications
	Qwen3-4B	Trinity Large Thinking
Provider	Alibaba (Qwen)	Arcee AI
Noometry Index	31.9	38.6
Released	2025-04-29	2026-04-01
Weights	Open	Open
Context window	—	262K
Max output	—	80K
Input $ / M tokens	—	$0.25
Output $ / M tokens	—	$0.80
Results tracked	6	24

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-4B	Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena WebDev	—	1238
SciCode	—	36.1%
LMArena Coding	—	1381

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100), Trinity Large Thinking: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-4B	Trinity Large Thinking
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard	35.7%	—

Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads

Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-4B	Trinity Large Thinking
NYT Connections (extended)	—	16.5%
CritPt	—	0.9%
Chess Puzzles	4%	—
Thematic Generalization	—	41.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts	—	1350
Surface Evolver Bench	—	15.6%

Math Trinity Large Thinking leads

Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-4B	Trinity Large Thinking
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions	38.5%	—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	52.2%	—
LMArena Math	—	1366

Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads

Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-4B	Trinity Large Thinking
Vectara Hallucination Rate	5.7%	6.9%
GPQA Diamond	52.3%	—
LMArena Expert	—	1360

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-4B	Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English	—	1325
LMArena Chinese	—	1373
LMArena French	—	1374
LMArena German	—	1356
LMArena Japanese	—	1311
LMArena Korean	—	1306
LMArena Russian	—	1337
LMArena Spanish	—	1357

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-4B	Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following	—	1334

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-4B	Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query	—	1355

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-4B	Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text	—	1340
LMArena Creative Writing	—	1320
LMArena Multi-Turn	—	1342

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-4B better than Trinity Large Thinking?