Model comparison

Qwen3-4B vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-4B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 33.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 52.2% for Qwen3-4B and 91.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3-4B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Qwen3-4BQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.951.5
Released2025-04-292026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked629

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.6 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
LMArena Coding—1471

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.6 Max Preview
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard35.7%—
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.6 Max Preview
Chess Puzzles4%20%
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1457
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.24

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.6 Max Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202552.2%91.1%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions38.5%—
LMArena Math—1465
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.6 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond52.3%87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.7%—
LMArena Expert—1478

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English—1437
LMArena Chinese—1487
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Russian—1445
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1438

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1457

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text—1447
LMArena Creative Writing—1435
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-4B better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3-4B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-4B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper