Model comparison
Qwen3 32B vs Yi 6B
Qwen3 32B has enough public results to be ranked (#166); Yi 6B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Qwen3 32B | Yi 6B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | — |
| Released | 2025-04 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.70 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 26 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 40% | — |
| SciCode | 35.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1358 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 48.7% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.51 | 104.37 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 54.9% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |
| DTBench | 67.5% | — |
| LMCA | 17.3% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 47.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 74.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 71.3% |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1399 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 44.9% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1362 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 50.3% |
| MMLU | — | 64% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 74.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1327 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1331 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3 32B better than Yi 6B?
Qwen3 32B has enough public results to be ranked (#166); Yi 6B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3 32B and Yi 6B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3 32B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Yi 6B has 7.