Model comparison

Qwen3-30B-A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • Qwen3-30B-A3B is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 41K.

Side by side

Qwen3-30B-A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Qwen3-30B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.934.3
Released2025-04-282026-02-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window41K262K
Max output16K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.12$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$0.50$0.80
Results tracked323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-30B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode33.3%32.3%
WeirdML29.8%34.4%
LMArena Coding1416—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-30B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard41.4%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-30B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
CritPt0.3%0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark54.9%—
Chess Puzzles8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1398—
DTBench69.3%—
LMCA22.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index139.63—

Math Not comparable

Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-30B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions47.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202570.3%—
LMArena Math1394—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-30B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond70.1%—
Confabulations12.3%—
LMArena Expert1396—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-30B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1372—
LMArena Chinese1433—
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1380—
LMArena Japanese1337—
LMArena Korean1331—
LMArena Russian1370—
LMArena Spanish1404—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-30B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1363—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-30B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
Fiction.LiveBench40.6%—
LMArena Longer Query1379—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-30B-A3BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1384—
LMArena Creative Writing1317—
Short-Story Creative Writing75.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1378—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-30B-A3B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-30B-A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.

Is Qwen3-30B-A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3-30B-A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper