Model comparison
Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Ring-2.6-1T
Qwen3 235B-A22B has enough public results to be ranked (#83); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher in 1 category and Ring-2.6-1T in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 25.3 to 15.8.
Side by side
| Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2025-04 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.70 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 49 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 235B-A22B leads
Qwen3 235B-A22B: 43.8 (#72), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.4% | 42.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 41% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.7 (#48), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 52.1% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -11.34 | — |
Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads
Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.8 (#302), Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 3.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 69.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 11% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1433 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 9% | — |
| DTBench | 80.3% | — |
| LMCA | 29.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.87 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.7 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3 235B-A22B: 48.5 (#51), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 71.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 68.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 8.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.5 (#67), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 80.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 72.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.5 (#84), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1481 | — |
| LMArena French | 1445 | — |
| LMArena German | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1429 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.8 (#132), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1408 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#25), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1426 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.8 (#103), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1384 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1366 | — |
| WildBench | 86.6% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3 235B-A22B better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Qwen3 235B-A22B has enough public results to be ranked (#83); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Qwen3 235B-A22B or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3 235B-A22B and Ring-2.6-1T share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.