Model comparison
Qwen3-1.7B vs Yi 6B
Qwen3-1.7B has enough public results to be ranked (#336); Yi 6B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Qwen3-1.7B | Yi 6B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 26.6 | — |
| Released | 2025-04-29 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.4% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 47.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 104.77 |
| HellaSwag | — | 74.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 71.3% |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 44.9% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278), Yi 6B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Yi 6B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 50.3% |
| MMLU | — | 64% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3-1.7B better than Yi 6B?
Qwen3-1.7B has enough public results to be ranked (#336); Yi 6B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3-1.7B and Yi 6B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-1.7B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Yi 6B has 7.