Model comparison
Qwen2-72B vs Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 30.2.
Side by side
| Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2024-06-07 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 26 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | 11.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1196 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 1.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.9% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads
Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.28 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1235 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | — |
| MMLU | 82.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1240 | — |
| LMArena French | 1170 | — |
| LMArena German | 1151 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1169 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1181 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1192 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1196 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2-72B better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen2-72B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2-72B and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2-72B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.