Model comparison

Qwen2-72B vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.2

Rank #95 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2-72B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 60.2 to 40.8.

Side by side

Qwen2-72B and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B specifications
Qwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.043.2
Released2024-06-072025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked2618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding11961439
WeirdML11.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct38.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete54%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
TheAgentCompany1.1%—
METR Time Horizons29.9%—

Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts11911428
Epoch Capabilities Index125.28—

Math Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Math12351426
MATH Level 539.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Expert11711442
GPQA Diamond40.8%—
MMLU82.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen2-72B: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Vision—1247

Multilingual Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English11761405
LMArena Chinese12401463
LMArena French11701452
LMArena German11511424
LMArena Japanese11111385
LMArena Korean10831394
LMArena Russian11691408
LMArena Spanish11691428

Instruction Following Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following11811406

Long Context Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query11921420

Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Text12031420
LMArena Creative Writing11811366
LMArena Multi-Turn11961428

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2-72B better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen2-72B or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2-72B and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2-72B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper