Model comparison

Qwen2-72B vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

29.5

Rank #294 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

44.7

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2-72B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 41.0.
  • Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen2-72B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
Qwen2-72BQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.544.7
Released2024-06-07—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding11961488
WeirdML11.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct38.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete54%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3.5 Max Preview
TheAgentCompany1.1%—
METR Time Horizons29.9%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts11911483
Epoch Capabilities Index125.27—

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math12351473
MATH Level 539.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert11711489
GPQA Diamond40.8%—
MMLU82.4%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English11761465
LMArena Chinese12401534
LMArena French11691483
LMArena German11511487
LMArena Japanese11111497
LMArena Korean10831438
LMArena Russian11691472
LMArena Spanish11681470

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following11811467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query11931477

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2-72BQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text12031471
LMArena Creative Writing11811464
LMArena Multi-Turn11951478

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2-72B better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen2-72B or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2-72B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2-72B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper