Model comparison
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 3 leads 27.6 to 20.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 36% for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct and 62.3% for Step 3.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2024-09 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $8.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 3: 39.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.4 (#136), Step 3: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | 5% | — |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.0 (#228), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 36% | 62.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1355 |
Math Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 3: 36.2 (#161)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
Multimodal Step 3 leads
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 32.9 (#92), Step 3: 34.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1107 | 1176 |
| Video-MME | 73.5% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 3: 46.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 3: 70.6 (#159)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 3: 40.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —, Step 3: 54.5 (#146)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct and Step 3 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.