Model comparison
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Arcee AISummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 38.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1314 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Trinity Large Thinking leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1298 | 1366 |
Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1289 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
Multilingual Trinity Large Thinking leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1373 |
| LMArena German | 1231 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | 1311 |
| LMArena Russian | 1271 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |
Instruction Following Trinity Large Thinking leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1334 |
Long Context Trinity Large Thinking leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1292 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Trinity Large Thinking leads
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1299 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Trinity Large Thinking share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.