Model comparison

Qwen2.5-Max vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Max scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 35.3.

Side by side

Qwen2.5-Max and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Qwen2.5-MaxQwen3.7 Max
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index40.751.5
Released2025-01-252026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked2733

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-MaxQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding13591498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
LiveBench Coding64.4%—
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Max: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-MaxQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-MaxQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13601483
Epoch Capabilities Index132.53153.68
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LiveBench Reasoning51.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis67.9%—
LMCA—44%
LiveBench62.3%—

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-MaxQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math13691490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
LiveBench Math58.4%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-MaxQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert13371488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
Confabulations21.8%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-MaxQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English13521474
LMArena Chinese13821530
LMArena Russian13531484
LMArena French1396—
LMArena German1350—
LMArena Japanese1300—
LMArena Korean1304—
LMArena Spanish1377—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-MaxQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13351460
LiveBench Instruction Following75.3%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-MaxQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query13581482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-MaxQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text13671476
LMArena Creative Writing13391449
LMArena Multi-Turn13641481
Short-Story Creative Writing72.9%—
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LiveBench Language56.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5-Max better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen2.5-Max or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Max and Qwen3.7 Max share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Max has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper