Model comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
Step 1o Turbo 202506 has enough public results to be ranked (#160); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
StepFunSummary
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | — | 39.7 |
| Released | 2024-09-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1339 |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1335 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.14 | — |
| HellaSwag | 76.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.9% | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1318 |
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.9% | — |
| MMLU | 68% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1380 |
| LMArena German | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1327 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1310 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1348 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1307 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 has enough public results to be ranked (#160); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.