Model comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) vs StarCoder 2 3B
Neither Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) nor StarCoder 2 3B has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | StarCoder 2 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | — | 36.3 |
| Released | 2024-09-18 | 2024-02-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, StarCoder 2 3B: 33.5
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 21.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 27.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.14 | 88.76 |
| WinoGrande | 72.9% | 57.1% |
| HellaSwag | 76.8% | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 86.7% | 21.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.9% | 34.2% |
| MMLU | 68% | 36.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) better than StarCoder 2 3B?
Neither Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) nor StarCoder 2 3B has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) and StarCoder 2 3B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 3B has 7.