Model comparison

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#62); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Plus
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index—47.5
Released2024-09-182026-03-31
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked637

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Plus
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
LMArena Coding—1467
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index113.14147.65
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1449
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
HellaSwag76.8%—
WinoGrande72.9%—

Math Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
LMArena Math—1450
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Plus
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%
LMArena Expert—1454
ARC (AI2) Challenge60.9%—
MMLU68%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1424
LMArena Chinese—1477
LMArena French—1455
LMArena German—1452
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1379
LMArena Russian—1434
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1425

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Plus
CL-bench—20.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text—1437
LMArena Creative Writing—1404
LMArena Multi-Turn—1438

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#62); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper