Model comparison

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Yi-Large

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#267); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #267 Confirmed

Yi-Large 01.AI

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Yi-Large in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-Large leads 36.7 to 33.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 55.9% for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and 47.2% for Yi-Large.
  • Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Yi-Large specifications
Qwen2.5 72B InstructYi-Large
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)01.AI
Noometry Index31.938.1
Released2024-092024-05-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$5.60—
Results tracked433

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Yi-Large leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructYi-Large
BigCodeBench Instruct45.8%37.7%
BigCodeBench Complete55.9%47.2%
WeirdML16%—
LMArena Coding1292—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133), Yi-Large: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructYi-Large
TheAgentCompany5.7%—
BALROG16.2%—
METR Time Horizons35.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199), Yi-Large: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructYi-Large
LMArena Hard Prompts1271—
DTBench62.9%—
LMCA13.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index129—
ForecastBench57.5—
HellaSwag84.8%—
PIQA82.6%—
WinoGrande82.3%—

Math Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287), Yi-Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructYi-Large
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.1%—
Omni-MATH33%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253), Yi-Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructYi-Large
MMLU85.3%79.3%
GPQA Diamond49.1%—
MMLU-Pro63.1%—
Confabulations19.1%—
GPQA (HELM)42.6%—
LMArena Expert1245—
ARC (AI2) Challenge94.5%—
TriviaQA71.9%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213), Yi-Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructYi-Large
LMArena Non-English1252—
LMArena Chinese1272—
LMArena French1280—
LMArena German1234—
LMArena Japanese1180—
LMArena Korean1188—
LMArena Russian1264—
LMArena Spanish1256—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221), Yi-Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructYi-Large
IFEval80.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1254—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188), Yi-Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructYi-Large
LMArena Longer Query1282—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215), Yi-Large: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructYi-Large
LMArena Text1269—
LMArena Creative Writing1221—
WildBench80.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1272—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Yi-Large?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#267); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Yi-Large better for coding?

Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Yi-Large share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper