Model comparison

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3-4B

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #267 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-4B leads 29.7 to 19.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 8.1% for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.

Side by side

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3-4B specifications
Qwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3-4B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.931.9
Released2024-092025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$5.60—
Results tracked436

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3-4B
WeirdML16%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.8%—
LMArena Coding1292—
BigCodeBench Complete55.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-4B leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133), Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%
TheAgentCompany5.7%—
BALROG16.2%—
METR Time Horizons35.8%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1271—
DTBench62.9%—
LMCA13.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index129—
ForecastBench57.5—
HellaSwag84.8%—
PIQA82.6%—
WinoGrande82.3%—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3-4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.1%52.2%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
Omni-MATH33%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond49.1%52.3%
MMLU-Pro63.1%—
Confabulations19.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
GPQA (HELM)42.6%—
LMArena Expert1245—
ARC (AI2) Challenge94.5%—
MMLU85.3%—
TriviaQA71.9%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1252—
LMArena Chinese1272—
LMArena French1280—
LMArena German1234—
LMArena Japanese1180—
LMArena Korean1188—
LMArena Russian1264—
LMArena Spanish1256—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3-4B
IFEval80.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1254—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1282—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1269—
LMArena Creative Writing1221—
WildBench80.2%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1272—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3-4B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper