Model comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 32.2 to 16.2.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-09 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.70 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.3% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.52 | — |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 46.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.