Model comparison

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct vs StarCoder 2 15B

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#297); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

30.1

Rank #297 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 15B NVIDIA

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 15B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 52.3% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and 38.4% for StarCoder 2 15B.

Side by side

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and StarCoder 2 15B specifications
Qwen2.5 32B InstructStarCoder 2 15B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)NVIDIA
Noometry Index30.138.1
Released2024-092024-02-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.70—
Output $ / M tokens$2.80—
Results tracked77

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.6

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 32B InstructStarCoder 2 15B
BigCodeBench Complete52.3%38.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct45%—
HumanEval+—37.8%

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 32B InstructStarCoder 2 15B
Epoch Capabilities Index128.52105
Chess Puzzles0%—
WinoGrande—64.3%

Math Not comparable

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 32B InstructStarCoder 2 15B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.4%—
MATH Level 556.1%—
GSM8K—57.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 32B InstructStarCoder 2 15B
GPQA Diamond46.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—47.2%
MMLU—64.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better than StarCoder 2 15B?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#297); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and StarCoder 2 15B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper