Model comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.1 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2024-09 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Max output | 8K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.70 | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.80 | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.52 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 46.1% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.1 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 131K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 32B Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.