Model comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Yi-Large
Neither Qwen2.5 14B Instruct nor Yi-Large has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Yi-Large in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 52.2% for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and 47.2% for Yi-Large.
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Yi-Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.2 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2024-09 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.35 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.1 (#187), Yi-Large: 36.1 (#201)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.8% | 37.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.2% | 47.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 79.9% | 79.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better than Yi-Large?
Neither Qwen2.5 14B Instruct nor Yi-Large has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Is Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Yi-Large better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Yi-Large share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.