Model comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#156); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2024-09 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.35 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.40 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| MMLU | 79.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#156); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 14B Instruct lists at $0.35 and $1.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.