Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
StepFunSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3 leads 54.3 to 29.6.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 40.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | 1367 |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1065 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
Math Step 3 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | 1366 |
Knowledge Step 3 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | 1333 |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |
Multilingual Step 3 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1141 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | 1331 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following Step 3 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | 1332 |
Long Context Step 3 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Step 3 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1083 | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-7B or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Step 3 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.